CHIME request Patient Identification from Congress

The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions group focusing on enhancing EHRs, CHIME highlights correct patient identification like a critical requirement for making certain patient safety.

The business composed in excess of 1,400 CIOs along with other health IT professionals, released an offer in the Annual CHIME Spring Forum in the HIMSS Annual Conference last April. Since that time, the business has managed to get its pursuit to press for any unique patient identifier.

“The accurate and efficient matching of patients using their health care information is a signification threat to patient safety,” authored CHIME Boss Russell P. Branzell and CHIME Board Chair Charles E. Christian within the letter to Lamar Alexander, a Republican from Tennessee and chairman from the Senate HELP Committee, and WA State, ranking person in the committee along with a Democrat from Washington Condition.

The answer, Branzell and Christian advised within their letter, would be to “take away the Congressional prohibition levied on HHS yearly since 1999, barring using federal funds to add mass to a distinctive patient identifier.

“We have to first acknowledge that the possible lack of a regular patient identity matching strategy is easily the most significant challenge suppressing the safe and sound electronic exchange of health information. As our health care system starts to understand the innately life changing abilities of health IT, on your journey to countrywide health information exchange, this essential core functionality consistency in patient identity matching should be addressed,” they condition within their letter.

Within the letter, CHIME known as on Congress to get rid of the prohibition barring federal government bodies from determining standards to enhance positive patient identification.

With removing the outdated prohibition, Branzell and Christian mentioned, “we feel then the nation can sincerely participate in a dialogue on finding methods to solve this fundamental patient safety problem.”

Comments are closed.